Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paychatìk
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Complex/Rational 20:28, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Paychatìk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Another non-notable crypto thing. Even the sources used are flowery. Oaktree b (talk) 20:13, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency and Nigeria. Oaktree b (talk) 20:13, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Products, and Software. Skynxnex (talk) 20:32, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - Article fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG. None of the sources in the article show any notability. Source assessment follows. - Aoidh (talk) 21:17, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
| Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Churnalism, text can be found word-for-word here as well.
|
Reprinted PR
|
~ | ✘ No | |
| churnalism, made very obvious by the fact that the press release it's based off of is found word-for-word in other unrelated sites.
|
Reprinted PR
|
|
✘ No | |
| Interview with founder, all information is a direct quote from them
|
|
~ | ✘ No | |
| Interview with founder
|
|
Trivial mention of this article's subject
|
✘ No | |
| Interview with founder
|
|
Trivial mention of this article's subject
|
✘ No | |
| Churnalism; same text can be found here.
|
Based on PR
|
|
✘ No | |
|
|
|
Trivial mention of this article's subject
|
✘ No | |
| Churnalism, also found here.
|
Based off of PR
|
|
✘ No | |
| Churnalism from the same source as Ref 6: here. | Based off PR
|
|
✘ No | |
| PR copy about an unrelated business
|
|
Very trivial passing mention of this article's subject
|
✘ No | |
| As with Ref 10, this is PR about an unrelated business and looks to be from the same PR
|
|
Very trivial passing mention of this article's subject
|
✘ No | |
| Churnalism; PR can also be found here
|
Based off PR
|
|
✘ No | |
| This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}. | ||||
The article's sources are all churnalism based off of PR. Moving from the sources in the article I could not find a single independent reliable source with significant coverage of the subject anywhere online; to meet WP:GNG articles must have multiple such sources, but this one does not even appear to have one, which is to say nothing of WP:NORG which is even stricter. - Aoidh (talk) 21:16, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Most of the text was copied/adapted from Bundle Africa. — Diannaa (talk) 22:29, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, Aoidh's source assessment table appears accurate. —siroχo 22:42, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete As per nom. Lethweimaster (talk) 19:53, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and Aoidh fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:46, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete That is a very comprehensive and damming source analysis table. scope_creepTalk 10:47, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.