Jump to content

User talk:L235/Archive 21

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 15Archive 19Archive 20Archive 21

Upcoming Language Community Meeting (Feb 28th, 14:00 UTC) and Newsletter

Copied from Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous) § Upcoming Language Community Meeting (Feb 28th, 14:00 UTC) and Newsletter because this page is listed on Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)/Subscribe.

Hello everyone!

An image symbolising multiple languages

We’re excited to announce that the next Language Community Meeting is happening soon, February 28th at 14:00 UTC! If you’d like to join, simply sign up on the wiki page.

This is a participant-driven meeting where we share updates on language-related projects, discuss technical challenges in language wikis, and collaborate on solutions. In our last meeting, we covered topics like developing language keyboards, creating the Moore Wikipedia, and updates from the language support track at Wiki Indaba.

Got a topic to share? Whether it’s a technical update from your project, a challenge you need help with, or a request for interpretation support, we’d love to hear from you! Feel free to reply to this message or add agenda items to the document here.

Also, we wanted to highlight that the sixth edition of the Language & Internationalization newsletter (January 2025) is available here: Wikimedia Language and Product Localization/Newsletter/2025/January. This newsletter provides updates from the October–December 2024 quarter on new feature development, improvements in various language-related technical projects and support efforts, details about community meetings, and ideas for contributing to projects. To stay updated, you can subscribe to the newsletter on its wiki page: Wikimedia Language and Product Localization/Newsletter.

We look forward to your ideas and participation at the language community meeting, see you there!


MediaWiki message delivery 08:29, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2025 Issue 3


MediaWiki message delivery 20:13, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 February 2025

Sunday, April 6, 2025 Minnesota User Group Meeting

In the area? You're invited to the April 2025 Minnesota User Group Meeting

The organizer of this event is Joe Hoover aka Myotus feel free to drop him a message.

Sunday, April 6, 2025 is New Beer's Eve and the Minnesota User Group is meeting to celebrate at Lake Monster Brewing Company!


  • When: Sunday, April 6, 2025, from 1 to 3:30 pm CDT
  • Where: Lake Monster Brewing Company, Taproom space
    550 Vandalia St #160, St Paul, Minnesota

Please RVSP on the event page.

Transit

  • Metro Green Line | Raymond Ave Station
  • Buses: 63 & 67
Look forward to seeing folks! While there will be free snacky bits, there is a pizza restaurant next door, OG Zaza, that you can order food from.
Myotus (talk) 17:43, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2025).

Administrator changes

removed

CheckUser changes

removed

Oversighter changes

removed AmandaNP

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • A new filter has been added to the Special:Nuke tool, which allows administrators to filter for pages in a range of page sizes (in bytes). This allows, for example, deleting pages only of a certain size or below. T378488
  • Non-administrators can now check which pages are able to be deleted using the Special:Nuke tool. T376378

Miscellaneous


Universal Code of Conduct annual review: proposed changes are available for comment

Copied from Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous) § Universal Code of Conduct annual review: proposed changes are available for comment because this page is listed on Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)/Subscribe.

Please help translate to other languages..

I am writing to you to let you know that proposed changes to the Universal Code of Conduct (UCoC) Enforcement Guidelines and Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) Charter are open for review. You can provide feedback on suggested changes through the end of day on Tuesday, 18 March 2025. This is the second step in the annual review process, the final step will be community voting on the proposed changes. Read more information and find relevant links about the process on the UCoC annual review page on Meta.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. This annual review was planned and implemented by the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, you may review the U4C Charter.

Please share this information with other members in your community wherever else might be appropriate.

-- In cooperation with the U4C, Keegan (WMF) 18:51, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Universal Code of Conduct annual review: proposed changes are available for comment

Copied from Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous) § Universal Code of Conduct annual review: proposed changes are available for comment because this page is listed on Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)/Subscribe.

Please help translate to other languages..

I am writing to you to let you know that proposed changes to the Universal Code of Conduct (UCoC) Enforcement Guidelines and Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) Charter are open for review. You can provide feedback on suggested changes through the end of day on Tuesday, 18 March 2025. This is the second step in the annual review process, the final step will be community voting on the proposed changes. Read more information and find relevant links about the process on the UCoC annual review page on Meta.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. This annual review was planned and implemented by the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, you may review the U4C Charter.

Please share this information with other members in your community wherever else might be appropriate.

-- In cooperation with the U4C, Keegan (WMF) 18:51, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2025 Issue 4


MediaWiki message delivery 15:55, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of a group of Wikipedians to better understand their experiences! We are also looking to interview some survey respondents in more detail, and you will be eligible to receive a thank-you gift for the completion of an interview. The outcomes of this research will shape future work designed to improve on-wiki experiences.

We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this survey, which shouldn’t take more than 2-3 minutes. You may view its privacy statement here. Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Kind regards, Sam Walton (talk) 16:34, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 March 2025

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2025 Issue 5


MediaWiki message delivery 17:37, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Inappropriate unblock

What is the meaning of this? I very clearly did not give my approval on this unblock. The fact that you specifically requested my input makes this all the more baffling. Why did you ask for my input just to entirely disregard my direct input? I am very not okay with this. Sergecross73 msg me 18:31, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

@Sergecross73: Hey Serge. I considered and appreciated your input alongside the response of the blocked user, as provided in the unblock review process. My concluding comment, as well as the conditional unblock condition, were intended to focus on (and make sure the user understands) the concerns you raised after I pinged you, and to ensure that if any inappropriate edit arises, the user will be disallowed from editing the article with a minimal amount of fuss – without even requiring admin action. In the end though, the block appeal process is for review by uninvolved administrators. Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 19:15, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
But you're supposed to consult with the blocking admin. What you did was not "consulting". You flat out ignored me and acted against my wishes. You didn't even attempt to engage me in discussion. This is not in fact how the unblock system is meant to function. Read the last paragraph of the very section you just linked to - unblocking admin are to take actions that shouldn't lead to WP:WW. How do you reconcile that with what you did? Concerns were not addressed. Discussions went unresolved. Multiple other editors also rejected the unblock on the same concerns I had. Yet you decide to unilaterally ignore all of that? Deeply disappointed by your judgement call here. I'm really shocked, I believed we've engaged in the past, and I had seen you as a reasonable editor. But this was not handled well at all. Sergecross73 msg me 19:21, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
@Sergecross73: I apologize. Clearly I misread how strong your objection was. That's on me. For what it's worth, though, I took your input quite seriously, and it's also on me that I didn't make that more clear in the thread.
If you really want to, you have my permission to reinstate the block and reopen the appeal. Removing this partial block doesn't in fact matter that much to me. I will say, this degree of response is somewhat surprising. I reduced a one-page partial block to a restriction that if anyone objects to the user's editing, the user must stop. It seemed to me to be a fairly minor action.
Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 19:41, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
@Sergecross73: Or, I am also glad to self-report this to AN for community input if you prefer. KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 19:49, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
I don't see any need for AN if you're willing to undo your action and reopen the discussions on it.
My frustration, beyond what I outlined above, is that I don't believe that anything has changed with this editor. There was a lot of warnings and attempted guidance before I resorted to a block. A lot of refusal to use sources, a lot of WP:IDHT excuses, etc, lead us to the block. And when I asked them to demonstrate how they've added sources to other articles recently, they couldn't provide any, and appeared to be unwilling to make any new edits to prove this either. To me, it doesn't look like they're willing to edit in accordance to using sources. They're attitude appears to be that they don't need to be able to use sources to make minor adjustments, but their interest doesn't appear to be grammar or copywriting, so it's just going to become an issue again if they don't address it. Sergecross73 msg me 20:06, 30 March 2025 (UTC)